Brett Henson acting under duress: Paul McGirr

A taxi driver whose cab was allegedly stolen by a high-flying real estate executive from Sydney’s CBD has told a court another driver shouted “chase him” as the man fled.

Brett Henson, 42, fronted Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday charged with a range of driving offences, including taking and driving a conveyance and driving under the influence of alcohol.

A prominent figure in the real estate market, Mr Henson was arrested late last year after photos of the incident were circulated by NSW Police in pursuit of the alleged culprit.

Police allege Mr Henson stole the silver taxi from Hunter St in Sydney’s CBD while intoxicated after threatening the driver shortly before 9pm on November 4, 2022.

Officers further allege that the Bronte resident drove dangerously before the vehicle later allegedly dumped several kilometres away in Woolhara with “significant damage”.

Paul McGirr told the court Mr Henson was “under duress”, having allegedly been assaulted by “another party” who was believed to be part of a group of cab drivers.

“He (Mr Henson) was knocked around and injured, which police were made aware of,” Mr McGirr said.

“My client takes the particular cab and drives it, and appears to be followed by another taxi driver.

“He leaves the scene and goes around the conservatorium, and ends up on the Eastern Distributor Freeway.

“Importantly, he believed he was being followed (...) my client was under duress at the time.”

During the hours-long hearing, Mr McGirr focused heavily on the events leading up to the alleged taxi theft, as well as investigations into a number of unidentified men believed to have been present.

The taxi driver, Sayeed Ali Khan, gave evidence that an unidentified taxi driver shouted “let’s chase him (Mr Henson) ... do you want to go catch him”, before later rolling back those comments.

Instead, Mr Khan later claimed in court that the other taxi driver had instead urged for them to see if they could find Mr Henson and the man’s cab, before driving around the block.

That claim, as well as those surrounding Mr Henson’s intoxication and the presence of other drivers, came under fire by Mr McGirr who questioned Mr Khan’s account of events.

Mr Khan claimed he had seen Mr Henson on the ground before he allegedly took his taxi, but told the court he did not see or know how the real estate executive ended up there.

Instead, Mr Khan claimed Mr Henson had been “aggressive” and had shouted at himself and other cab drivers and bystanders gathered on the busy Sydney CBD street.

“He came to me and said: ‘(do) you want to fight with me?’” Mr Khan said. “Everyone wanted to help me, and he wanted to fight with the other people.”

Crucially, Mr Khan told Mr McGirr he could not identify who the other men were and could not remember if they had been aggressive with, or even pushed, Mr Henson.

Mr McGirr put to the cabbie allegations that other men present at the time had told Mr Henson they were members of the Muslim Brotherhood or the NSW Police.

The latter claim, Mr McGirr told the court, could explain why Mr Henson did not call triple-0 after the alleged attack, and before allegedly fleeing in the taxi.

In his opening submission, Mr McGirr said ID would “not be an issue” in the case, while also relegating allegations of his intoxication to be a “side issue”.

The police prosecutor, Mr Philipson, told the court they would not be producing any form of pharmaceutical or toxicology report into Mr Henson’s alleged intoxication.

Under questioning, Mr Khan admitted only told police of allegations Mr Henson was “slurring his words”, “smelt of alcohol”, and had red eyes when entering the taxi in a second statement taken months later.

The police officer in charge of the investigation said she had paraphrased Mr Khan’s evidence, with the police prosecutor saying it was not their duty to investigate discrepancies between Mr Khan’s two statements.

Mr McGirr further questioned the officer over investigations into a number of identified men seen on video at the time of the incident, but who were not identified in NSW Police media releases following the incident.

The police prosecutor, Mr Philipson, played video to the court on Wednesday of the moments before the alleged taxi theft, beginning with Mr Henson leaving the Ivy restaurant on George St.

In the video, Mr Henson is seen opening the door to a taxi about 8.40pm on Hunter St before falling to the ground as the passenger-side door is flung open and breaking the handle.

The driver of the cab is seen leaving the driver-side and talking with Mr Henson outside the vehicle for a period of time, before pursuing Mr Henson down nearby Hunter Ln.

In a later part of the video, Mr McGirr claimed a number of unidentified men are seeing with Mr Henson, with an unknown man at one stage placing his hand on the executive’s shoulder.

The footage also showed Mr Henson allegedly taking off with the taxi, with video taken inside the cabin showing him driving through the streets before dumping the cab on Queen St.

Mr Henson will reappear before the same court in March 2024, when a second driver who allegedly drove after him, and police are expected to give evidence.

This article originally appeared on News.com.au


Paul McGirr defends Daniel Keneally with the assistance of crucial expert evidence

Paul McGirr has this week strongly defended police officer Daniel Keneally against claims he allegedly fabricated evidence with intent to mislead a judicial tribunal.

His lawyer Paul McGirr argued the police officer made an unintentional mistake in confusing the phone call with the material on Mr Moore’s website, “isuepolice.com” which he was browsing at the same time. The website contained a number of scandalous claims against officers at Goulburn Police Station and former Police Commissioner Mick Fuller.

Mr Keneally conceded the “rambling and incoherent” phone call did not contain any threats of violence or any mention of the name of the rural detective.

Constable Keneally admitted he “wasn’t totally focused” on the phone call with Mr Moore because he was browsing the caller’s website and the police database while also attending to duties.

Forensic psychiatrist Dr Olav Nielssen opined the “sheer amount” of distractions had the effect of “undermining the accuracy of (Constable Keneally’s) recollection”.

“Our memory is not reliable,” he told the court.

Senior lecturer and memory expert Dr Stefanie Sharman agreed, noting that splitting his focus is likely to have weakened his ability to recall information and its source.

“Even a couple of minutes is enough for people’s memories of conversations to decay pretty significantly,” she said.

Prosecutors claimed Mr Keneally had made the statement with the knowledge it could be used to arrest and prosecute Mr Moore.

Mr McGirr refuted the claim, telling the court his client was following instructions when he gave the statement and he didn’t expect it would lead to criminal prosecution.

“Clearly we concede my client has made a mistake in terms of his recall in this matter, which is compounded by the fact that he put it in an intelligence report,” he said.

Yet he maintained there was “no real smoking gun” that explained why Mr Keneally would have intentionally made a false statement against Mr Moore, whom he didn’t know, nor did Mr Keneally have any connection to the Goulburn Police officer.

Under cross examination, Constable Keneally vehemently denied that making the statement would help advance his career. Indeed, he said the only way to gain promotion as a constable was accruing years of service.

The matter has been adjourned for decision on 21 November 2023.




Gamble’s ‘fatal’ refusal to testify against Canberra Raider’s Jack Wighton

Paul McGirr told the Daily Telegraph on Monday that Newcastle Knights five-eighth Tyson Gamble’s failure to testify at the NRL Judiciary could be fatal to proving that Raiders player Jack Wighton guilty of biting.

“Tyson Gamble made an on-field report. He wanted it investigated and now he doesn’t want to provide a statement, so that will damage the case.

“The best evidence would come from the person allegedly bitten. The best comes from the alleged victim of a crime,” Paul McGirr said.

“If they don’t want to get involved, give a statement or say they are not sure, that is often fatal.

“The evidence as it sits is yes, there are marks on his arms, but if Wighton hasn’t said anything in relation to biting, and the victim doesn’t want to be involved, it could be as incidental as having an arm around the mouth.”

Lawyer acquitted of destroying footage

Our client Alev Oncu was found Not Guilty of perverting the course of justice by a Parramatta jury on Friday 4 August after a two-week trial, after a team effort by solicitors Robert Candelori and Paul McGirr and counsel Michael Smith.

It had been alleged by the Crown Prosecutors that Ms Oncu had deleted CCTV footage at her home, however key crown witness, CCTV technician Salar Norouzi, could not explain how it was the system was formatted three times within a few minutes of his entry and said he could have formatted the system himself on at least one of those occasions. He also could not explain and could not recall why it was he visited Ms Oncu in August 2019.

The acquittal comes after four years awaiting trial due to COVID-19 delays and late service of evidence by the NSW Police.

Tetaan Henning charges dismissed and likely civil suit after his arm was snapped outside Wagga Wagga pub

Tetaan Henning is planning to sue NSW Police after he was check-drilled onto a busy road, had his arm was snapped and was called a "c**t" by an officer outside a Wagga Wagga pub.

Charges laid months after the incident were all dismissed after a successful defence by Paul McGirr.

“That is a busy highway and the officer is lucky he did not kill my client by pushing him into the path of a truck,” Paul McGirr said. “And couple this with the fact that the officer has severely injured my client and then somehow reasons that he had cause to charge him with assaulting police.”

In arguing the offensive language charge, one of the officers agreed they had called Mr Henning a “c--t” after he swore when he asked them why they had ejected two of his friends – one with a brain injury and the other who is a quadriplegic – from the pub.

The court was also told that the officer who pushed Mr Henning did not follow correct police procedures by issuing a move-on order before using force on the 43-year-old.

“It’s like the wild west of Wagga Wagga,” Mr McGirr said. “It’s disgraceful behaviour and it always starts from the top.”

"Are you mental?": Tony Brindle charges dismissed after Uber driver abducts him

An absurd case of alleged assault of an Uber driver has been thrown out of court after the Magistrate found that that our client Tony Brindle had been abducted against his will with the driver refusing to stop the vehicle or tell Mr Brindle where he was going.

Mr McGirr successfully argued that the prosecution case was not made out after the Uber driver was found to be an unreliable witness and accepted in cross-examination that he hadn’t told Mr Brindle where he was taking him.

Mr Brindle is considering further action against Uber.

Charges against security guard Eamon MacDermott thrown out of court

Paul McGirr has today successfully defended an innocent security guard Eamon MacDermott from false assault charges.

Police had wrongly accused our client of assaulting a wedding guest at a reception held at Cafe Del Mar. Mr MacDermott had ejected the guest after he had punched the manager and it was revealed he had been drinking since 3pm that afternoon.

Police ultimately withdrew the charges and Mr McGirr successfully obtained a costs order against the police for their incompetent investigation.

NRL could face $100 million concussion bill

The NRL would face crippling bankruptcy through an “inevitable” concussion-related courtroom class action which could be worth a staggering $100 million.

That is the startling allegation from leading Australian lawyer Paul McGirr.

McGirr was talking after a class action against the AFL over concussion injuries was launched in the Melbourne Supreme Court last week by nearly 60 former players.

And McGirr said he had heard “murmurs” of possible court action against the NRL. Leading sport doctor Nathan Gibbs backed McGirr, claiming legal action by ex-players was “definite”.

“You’re talking at least $100 million and that’s a conservative figure. It could certainly bankrupt the game,” McGirr said.

“If you were paying $1 million to one particular person, imagine over the years, you’re talking hundreds or thousands of people putting claims in. You don’t have to be Einstein to figure out that this could be a major problem if their action was successful. The bottom line is I think it’s inevitable.

“I would be suprised if there was a class action this year but, certainly from the murmurs I have heard, people are talking and it’s been front-of-mind with the NRL, and wider circles, for some time.

“I have certainly heard rumblings in relation to individuals suffering certain health conditions and blaming the game of rugby league on those health conditions.

“If successful in their actions, you are talking about people’s living expenses and possible professional care for 20, 30-plus years, at least. People who have played the game believe they are entitled to be protected for life.

“I also think we are moving toward waivers, not that the NRL will admit that they are liable. The NRL and clubs will somehow look to alleviate their risks.

“I don’t believe the NRL will take any blame for any of these injuries but the NRL is trying to limit the chance of head knocks happening.”

Gibbs told the Big Sports Breakfast Weekend radio show: “I think there will definitely be some legal issues…because it’s happening in other codes. It will definitely happen in rugby league.”

A concerned NRL last week introduced a mandatory 11-day stand-down policy for concussed players. While certain the concussion lawsuit will end up in court, McGirr warned former players about their chances of success in the courtroom.

“It wouldn’t be a slam-dunk (in court) as it were in respect to just saying: ‘I was knocked out therefore I have certain medical effects due to being knocked out’,” McGirr said.

“You’ve got to prove which particular action caused you to have these injuries and what evidence supports the specifics of what caused the injury. You can’t say there is a class action and therefore I’m entitled to compensation for my injury. For instance, if I get knocked out in a bar fight and then played rugby league for another 10 years and got knocked out, the issue would be proving how the second knockout on the rugby league field caused the particular condition someone may have.

“And the second issue, what can they prove is attributed to the body’s natural deterioration or what can be attributed to brain injuries. The scientific research into these matters is still a grey area. There are people who have played chess or lawn bowls all their lives and they have the same issue - and they haven’t been knocked out.”

This story originally appeared in the Daily Telegraph print edition, page 49, on 20 March 2023 under the hand of Dean Ritchie.

Joch McLean avoids full-time custodial sentence

Paul McGirr, instructing Michael Smith barrister, has successfully argued that Joch McLean, the son of former Queensland origin player Mike McLean, should avoid full-time imprisonment after he was convicted of commercial drug supply.

District Court Judge Andrew Scotting issued Mr McLean a section 11 “Griffith” remand allowing him to continue rehabilitation with Elite Athlete Wellbeing Services, operated by Jan Earl.

“The ball is in his court,” Paul McGirr told the Daily Telegraph. “He needs to keep on the straight and narrow or he’ll go in. Simple as that.”

A victory for common sense: Darko Desic released from Villawood immigration detention

After a concerted effort by McGirr & Associates and supporters in and around the Northern Beaches, prison escapee Darko Desic has been released from immigration detention today.

Mr Desic captured the imagination of many Australians after handing himself in after 30 years on the run, escaping from Grafton prison in the early 1990s.

Faced with the prospect of deportation to a country that no longer exists, being the former Yugoslavia, there has been a long-running campaign by this firm to firstly have his sentence commuted, and secondly to have a visa issued by immigration authorities.

Today, common sense has finally prevailed.

“It’s given me renewed confidence in the Australia I know and the Australia I grew up in,” Paul McGirr said.

“He’s in shock,” Mr McGirr said. “He has accommodation and he hopes now to be able to get on with his life.”

Prison escapee Darko Desic wins deportation battle, granted visa | Daily Telegraph

Charges against Cameron Williams dismissed

Paul McGirr has successfully argued for charges against former Channel 9 presenter Cameron Williams to be dismissed under section 14 of the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020.

After successful negotiations, the charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm was withdrawn by police, however Magistrate Hockey discharged Mr Williams into the care of his psychologist in relation to the offence of common assault.

The agreed facts reveal the conversation about their future escalated into a “loud verbal argument” during which Mr Williams laid his hands on his partner.

The court heard the former Channel 9 stalwart grabbed Ms Russo on the upper arms and pushed her backwards. She then kicked him away, according to the facts.

“This is a very unfortunate incident,” Mr McGirr acknowledged.

He described the altercation as “two adults having a discussion” about the possibility of reconciliation.

“There is no striking, no hitting and no punching,” Magistrate Hockey agreed.

The court heard Mr Williams’ consumption of alcohol and prescription medication contributed to the incident.

Magistrate Hockey accepted Mr Williams had been struggling with his mental health for more than a year which acted to reduce his moral culpability.

He categorised the assault as an “impulsive reaction”.

The magistrate dismissed the assault charge on the grounds that Mr Williams was mentally unwell at the time.

Cameron Williams: Former Channel 9 sports presenter admits assault of wife | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site

Darko Desic released from prison but a new fight begins

A prison escapee who hid in Sydney's Northern Beaches for 29 years was released from the John Morony Correctional Complex today as the community fights to keep him from being deported.

Darko Desic escaped from Grafton jail in 1992 after being convicted of cannabis cultivation two years earlier and only last year turned himself in to police.

Desic served the final 19 months from his original 44-month sentence and an extra two months for breaking out but he's not yet a free man.

The 64-year-old said he escaped 30 years ago after being desperate to avoid being sent back to war-torn Yugoslavia, a country that no longer exists.

Desic worked as a handyman in Avalon and made friends with members of the local community during his decades in hiding, and they're now coming out to support him in his immigration battle.

Stonemason Scott Matthewson worked with Desic and described him as a "good fella".

"It's not a big charge these days ... if he got done today with it he'd probably get a fine."

The community has raised $30,000 so far to help save Desic from being deported.

"I can support him in a job and some accommodation and get him on his feet and there's a whole heap of others who will do exactly the same thing," Matthewson said.

"This is his home, he's got money, he's not going to be a demand on the taxpayer's dollar."

Desic is currently in immigration detention ahead of being deported to Croatia.

Pro-bono lawyer Paul McGirr is appealing to the immigration minister to grant the "valued community member" permission to stay.

"That's what the law is about, it's not one size fits all because everyone has a story ... and Darko's is an exceptional and fascinating story," McGirr said.

"Certainly I knew this day would come ... it's a new fight, but we will fight and do our best for him." 

A Current Affair - 16 December 2022


Paul McGirr to refer appalling police conduct to Law Enforcement Conduct Commission

Matthew McMahon’s life has been turned upside down after he was accused of touching a police sniffer dog inside a pub.

It has resulted in him being charged with failing to leave a pub – although prosecutors withdrew the charge on the first day of his case – and now he faces a fight to keep his driver’s licence, which he needs as a truck driver, after police requested Roads and Maritime examine his fitness to hold one.

Mr McMahon had only been inside Wagga Wagga’s William Farrer Hotel for a brief period and had consumed a minimal amount of alcohol before his troubles began on May 6.

The pub was packed with punters who had attended the Wagga Gold Cup races that day and police with a sniffer dog were making their way through the pub.

According to footage played in Wagga Local Court, one of the dogs went past Mr McMahon at 8.23pm. The dog’s handler confronted Mr McMahon and pointed a torch in his face after accusing him of touching the animal.

The court heard that another officer, Senior Constable Justin O’Kane, told Mr McMahon: “You’re out mate, let’s go you’re out” and: “Either you leave or you’re getting a ticket.”

When one of Mr McMahon’s friends intervened, Constable O’Kane said: “Don’t you f --king touch me c --t” and then said to both men: “Get the f --k out of the pub”, police documents said.

Police then physically escorted both men out.

Mr McMahon was charged with failing to leave a premises when required.

But the charge was withdrawn by prosecutors at Wagga Wagga Local Court on October 26.

CCTV footage of the incident showed the police dog walk past Mr McMahon, who looked at the animal but did not touch it, before the confrontation with police.

Mr McMahon’s lawyer Paul McGirr said he was preparing to refer the incident to the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission.

“When I last looked at the laws that govern police arrests, telling someone to: ‘Get the f —k out of the pub’ was not in the legislature,” Mr McGirr said. “He may have forgotten that he was wearing a body-worn camera that was recording the incident.”

Mr McGirr said police had since made representations to RMS to have it examine whether Mr McMahon was fit to hold a driver’s licence.

On November 25, Riverina Police Commander Superintendent Andrew Spliet wrote to Mr McGirr and declined to investigate the police conduct in the matter.

Matthew McMahon’s brush with police dog in Wagga pub turns life upsidedown | Daily Telegraph

Brett Finch receives 2-year community-based sentence

After detailed and lengthy legal submissions and evidence by Brett Finch’s legal team, including Paul McGirr and barrister Michael Smith, Judge Mahony today handed down judgment in which he found that Mr Finch did not have a sexual interest in children and that he will serve a community-based sentence for 2 years.

Mr Finch had previously told the NSW District Court he does not have a sexual interest in children and only began using the platform to seek out drugs after his dealer was arrested. At the time, he said, he was addicted to cocaine and was using between 12 and 25 grams per week.

“I would’ve been on a drug-fuelled bender,” Finch said.

He said he believed sending “twisted” messages on the platform would put him in contact with recipients who were on drugs, meaning he would be more likely to receive drugs. He acknowledged that he did not actually ask for drugs in any of the messages.

Judge Phillip Mahony said on Wednesday that Finch’s plan was “plainly absurd” and had no hope of success, but accepted that Finch’s motivation was a desire for drugs.

Mahony sentenced Finch to two years in jail, imposing a recognisance release order which meant Finch was immediately released to serve his sentence in the community. Under the terms of the order, Finch must pay $1000, be of good behaviour for two years, and continue receiving treatment including being tested for illicit drugs.

R v Finch - NSW Caselaw

Paul McGirr appears for Daniel Keneally

The police constable son of former NSW premier Kristina Keneally will fight allegations he fabricated false evidence.

Paul McGirr appeared at the Downing Centre Local Court in person on Thursday 17 November and entered a plea of not guilty on behalf of Mr Keneally.

Outside court, Mr McGirr said he had requested a brief of evidence in the matter.

“We’ll assess that and go from there,” he said.

“It’s a sensitive matter and it wouldn’t be right for me to comment at this stage.”

He confirmed Cst Keneally’s plea of not guilty.

Neurosurgeon Tim Steel wins bid for legal costs

High profile neurosurgeon Dr Tim Steel has won a court action to have the NSW Police pay his fees for the failed AVO case they levelled against him.

Police took out the provisional AVO after Dr Steel was accused of holding a knife to the throat of a female – who can’t legally be named – after an argument over ice cream that spilt on the floor in July.

The case fell apart on August 17 after it emerged that Dr Steel never threatened anyone with a knife and the alleged victim admitted they were lying about the incident.

Given the weakness of the case, Dr Steel applied to have the state pay his legal costs.

Magistrate Milledge awarded Dr Steel $11,000 costs and told the court the case had warning signs written all over it from the beginning.

Paul McGirr argued the police in the matter “were played” and “fell right into a trap”.

“It was an embarrassing set of circumstances and the matter should not have seen the light of day,” Mr McGirr said.

“But police insisted on proceeding with the matter and it could have caused extreme damage to my clients career and reputation.”

The court has previously heard that police arrived at the scene of the alleged incident where the complainant confirmed Dr Steel did not threaten her with a knife.

She then went horse riding before presenting at a police station six hours later to make a formal complaint for an AVO to be taken out. However, body worn camera footage emerged from the police who attended the scene of the alleged incident showing the complainant confirmed to the officers that she had lied about the knife and that she apologised to Dr Steel.

It is the second time in two years the high profile surgeon from St Vincent’s Hospital in Darlinghurst has been before the courts only to see the allegations disproved. In July 2020, Dr Steel was found not guilty of assaulting his ex wife, Emma Steel, at their Eastern Suburbs home. Magistrate Swain found that it was in fact Mrs Steel who had assaulted Dr Steel.

Neurosurgeon Tim Steel wins bid to have police pay legal fees after failed AVO case | Daily Telegraph

Craig Young a 'stand-up bloke' for supporting Brett Finch: Paul McGirr

Paul McGirr has passionately defended the character of St George Illawarra Dragons Chairman Craig Young after he received criticism for providing a letter of support for former NRL player Brett Finch in his sentencing proceedings.

“He’s a stand-up bloke,” McGirr told the Sydney Morning Herald.

“Craig has illustrated to me and the Finch family that if you can’t rely on people you think are your mates in your time of need, then they aren’t true mates. Many others offered silent support but Craig was prepared to not only put in writing his support but also front up to court and say it under oath. He wasn’t there to be popular. He was there to stand up and support.

“He knows all the facts and made it clear he despises anything to do with this type of offence. A great number of people aren’t interested in knowing the full story about why and how Brett committed this offence.

“He’s guilty regardless of the reasoning but Craig on oath made it clear that he doesn’t believe Brett has a sexual interest in children but drugs put him in this position.

“I’ve known Craig for over a decade and if I was going over the trenches, I’d want him next to me.”

Mr Finch is represented by McGirr & Associates.

Josh Dugan may sue Cronulla Sharks after COVID breach base

Former State of Origin star Josh Dugan will consider suing Cronulla for wrongful dismissal over his messy departure from the Sharks that ended his NRL career.

Dugan’s solicitor, Paul McGirr, said the ex-NSW and Australian champion was wrongly terminated by the Sharks over alleged Covid breaches when travelling near Lithgow in the state’s central west in August last year.

The matter is before the courts with Magistrate Kasey Pearce to hand down her decision on December 2.

Dugan and his housemate, Ben Williams, were charged with two counts each of failing to comply with a noticed direction under the Public Health Act, to which they have pleaded not guilty.

McGirr argued in Lithgow Court on August 31 that the case against the pair was flawed as his clients had no knowledge of the Covid legislation or restrictions at the time.

If Dugan loses the case, he will immediately appeal.

NRL 2022: Josh Dugan could sue Cronulla Sharks over sacking, alleged Covid breaches | Daily Telegraph

Pathetic case against Wagga Wagga mechanic Chris Dennis thrown out of court

In a textbook case as to why the NSW Highway Patrol police ought to stick to traffic matters, Paul McGirr has successfully defended long-time Wagga Wagga mechanic Chris Dennis from absurd allegations of fraud after a police inspection of his brake testing machine suggested the date was incorrect. It was also suggested that because he was suffering from cancer and operating this brake testing machine, he was allegedly braking Authorised Inspection Station rules for doing so., The so called fraud also included that he supposedly received $42 per test.

After police failed to adduce any evidence that there had been any fraudulent intent nor any evidence that he had actually received any payment as alleged, the case was thrown out of court, there being no ‘prima facie’ case.

“My client is now preparing to sue for wrongful arrest and possible malicious prosecution,” Mr McGirr said on Saturday. “The highway patrol should … stick to parking tickets and don’t busy yourself with fraud investigations.”

The story was featured in ‘The Snitch’ section of the Sunday Telegraph on 3 July 2022

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nsw/the-snitch-killers-daniel-kelsall-and-kelvin-willmott-to-remain-together-in-jail/news-story/8f970273b9c7f13732692fe18e40bd15

NSW Police withdraw AVO against Chris Nasser

NSW Police have today elected to withdraw their application for an apprehended violence order taken out by Hollie Nasser against her estranged husband, investor Christopher Nasser.

The interim order was taken out by Ms Nasser last December while she was embroiled in a high-profile society marriage split.

Paul McGirr had vigorously argued with police that the AVO was completely baseless and was being used by Ms Nasser as a “sword instead of a shield” against Mr Nasser who is a non-violent person.

'(Mr Nasser) has never been violent, he's quite the contrary, a reserved and humble person.

'At no stage would he ever strike anyone, particularly a woman and the mother of his children. 

'The whole process of having laundry aired in public, particularly for the children, has caused him great distress.

'His children have always been paramount. He wants to move on with his life and he holds no animosity towards anybody

'There are no winners in this, but it shows unfortunately how some people can allegedly use the system to seek an AVO, which should be used not as a sword but as a shield.

'My client is a gentle, loving father,’ Mr McGirr said.

Chris Nasser Hollie Nasser interim AVO dropped by police | Daily Telegraph